[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

orion-list 390 years and following

Orion readers,

The mention of 390 years in CD col. I has been much discussed: for 
instance, is 390 symbolic merely, or additionally an attempt at accurate 
chronology, and how much did the writer know about chronology? Also, it's 
been translated  variously; Rabinowitz's assertion that the lamed must 
indicate "before," was answered by H.H. Rowley (in Melanges...Andre 
Robert). But has anyone previously suggested that the 390 years should be 
counted not from the beginning but from the *end* of the period of being 
given into the hand of Nebuchadnezzar? If we count from the end, and if the 
number is approximately reliable, there are consequences. First, that "end" 
could mean the death of N. or the end of his empire, or the return of the 
Jews, or, perhaps (less possible?), the second temple dedication.

If we read that way then the revised archaeological chronology of Qumran 
appears to fit better. See e.g. Encyclopedia of the DSS (and a short review 
at amazon. com) for the view that Qumran was settled later than de Vaux's 
estimates and also not abandoned for long during the rule of Herod the 

After the 390 years, according to CD (and 4QD), God saw their deeds (root 
'asah) and after 20 years (to grow up?), because of their deeds, raised for 
them a teacher of righteousness. (Compare the description of who will join 
the covenant in 1QS col. I, which five times makes use of 'asah, which IMO 
is the source of "Essenes.")

Furthermore, please note that also in the other texts which mention the 
teacher, the 'osey hatorah are also remarkably represented (the teacher and 
the Essenes, in other words, IMO, are associated by the Qumran mss).

Also, this reading or dating would appear to be too late for Jonathan 
Maccabee as the wicked priest. On the other hand it would accord with 
Alexander Jannaeus as wicked priest and Judah the Essene teacher and 
prophet, the first Essene individual mentioned by Josephus (in Ant and 
War), as the TR.

In any case, has the reading of 390 as after the end of the period of being 
in N's hand been explored before? Thanks.

best regards,

stephen Goranson
Durham NC

For private reply, e-mail to goranson <goranson@acpub.duke.edu>
To unsubscribe from Orion, e-mail to majordomo@panda.mscc.huji.ac.il with
the message: "unsubscribe Orion." For more information on the Orion Center
or for Orion archives, visit our web site http://orion.mscc.huji.ac.il.