[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
orion RE: Orion Gmirkin's Proposals Part II
Stephen Goranson writes:
> Gmirkin wrote that the Judah the Essene story was invented to provide
> Menahem a teacher...
You appear not to understand my argument, which is that Judah was in fact
Menahem's teacher, that the anecdote has a historical kernal, and was
Herodian circles due to the relation of Judah and Menahem, and transmitted by
that the title "Judah the Essene" is an anachronism.
I am taking a break from from this discussion until I read Menahem Stern as
as the fragmenta of Posidonius, as I want to give Goranson's ideas a fair
However, in my current reading of Posidonius on the Jews as presented in
Josephus and in
a major fragment found in Strabo, my initial impression is that Posidonius
was an anti-
Semite whose writings contained much misinformation but no real information
or its sects. Hence I am growing increasingly sceptical of Posidonius as a
Essenes. If Goranson can show a single instance of direct dependency on
135-51 BCE) in an account on the Essenes, I would welcome this development
accept it as demonstrating pre-Herodian Essenes. Otherwise, the existence of
before Herod should be acknowledged as doubtful, a theoretical construct,
less than a
fact: which is itself a useful fact.
-- Russell Gmirkin