On Mon, 28 Jul 1997 15:39:57 +0000, goranson@acpub.duke.edu writes: > >To be brief, if you think you need more tests to tell anything of >consequence, why did you declare a pre-60 BCE date of deposit had been >determined? Sincerely, Stephen Goranson To be even briefer, I didn't need to. The facts speak for themselves, if you'd let them. Tom Simms