[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: orion James the Brother of Jesus
At 04:49 PM 5/16/97 -0400, you wrote:
>I have been slowly working my way through "James the Brother of Jesus." I'm
>only about half way through so far, but it seems to me that the broad stroke
>is something like the following:
Its a big book!!!
>1. James was a Nazorean/Essene/Rachabite/ priest whose approach to his
>religion was in pari materi with the "Qumran Sect." (The implication is that
>so was his brother.)
I too think this is clearly what Eisenman means.
>2. James was stoned by Herodian backed Pharisees because he was threatening
>their control of, inter alia, the Temple.
Not just the Temple- but the religious ideology of Jesus which was "anti
>3. The "early church" (i.e., befoe Paul) had no message for Gentiles
This too is what he means.
>4. The gospels and Acts are not accurate renditions of what the message of
>James and his brother.
Because Paul is a corrupter of the true message of Jesus and therefore of
James. The Gospels also buy into the Pauline Gospel (which, according to
Eisenman, and Gerd Luedemann, was the original heresy).
>5. Paul was a Herodian/Roman backed Pharisee individual who used Jesus as a
>touchstone to develop a position substantially left of the Pharisees.
ANd in harmony with the Roman domination of the land.
>6. The Dead Sea Scrolls confirm the above.
>Is the foregoing a reasonable understanding of the book
Quite so- at least as I read it.
> and do others agree
>with the tight parallels drawn between James and the Qumran Sect.
Absolutely not. The early Church and the Qumran community may drink from
the same well- but they are not the same thing. (as Eisenman seems to suggest).
Jim West, ThD
Pastor, Petros Baptist Church
Managing Editor, "The Journal of Biblical Studies" at