[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-14, coins, Essenes
On the C-14 I was merely quoting the easily accessible analyses found in
both Schiffman and VanderKam. I am aware of Greg's work in the area.
Your position on the coins however is simply untenable. VanderKam
obviously had a reason for keeping the Tyrian hoard separate (because it
was a hoard). The data is pretty plain on the coins issue: about twenty
coins from 76 bce to 6 ce, 143 from Alexander Jannaeus, and a big
collection under the procurators and lesser kings.
> The total coin number, which is rather small, coheres well with the
> Essene identification, as they had less call to carry coins daily than
> other populations.
Do you think you could elucidate on this? I don't understand how the
"total coin number...coheres well with the Essene identification".
> You attempt to refute the "Essene hypothesis" by
> attacking a straw man parody of it (e.g. as a small, isolated sect).
You are obviously misreading my post if you come to this conclusion. I'm
well aware of the Essenes as a town phenomenon as per Josephus. If you
read the Charlesworth edited "Jesus and the dss" there's a chapter on
the "Essene" quarter of Jerusalem.
I was attacking your parody of the problem of the scribal hands, which
you still need to deal with.
> you mischaracterize Sadducees (was Zadok a Sadducee?).
How? And what are your sources?
You are right about Laperrousaz "whose datings may suit you more".
> In brief, I do not agree with G.D. or R.G. in considering
> your dating proposal as well supported (yet).
Yes, I guess there's a lot to do yet.
> Robert Donceel wrote the article "Qumran" in the new Oxford Encyclopedia
> of Archaeology in the Near East. Michael Wise wrote on DSS and I wrote
> on Essenes. Of course, there is some overlap and some disagreements,
> but I hope you will find some useful information and bubliography there.
Thanks, it's always good to read the most recent stuff -- and
disagreements keep the situation honest!