[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

response to G. Doudna

Dear Greg, Thanks for your interesting response. I have to prepare
for a class, but some quick response. I look forward to your articles 
on AMS dates. Provisionally, though, doesn't accepting some first
century CE Qumran mss dates make your 62 BCE a quo (proposed on
other grounds yet relevant [beware of atomistic approaches you may be
offered, if I may sayu so]) moot?
Though you didn't respond to the inkwell section (and if "obliviousness"
was insulting, my apologies), but I sence we may be making progress: 
Can we agree that it is probable that some of the Qumran mss were
copied in Jerusalem, and some at Qumran, and some elsewhere?
With hope and best wishes, Stephen goranson