[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Vendyl Jones incense

At 12:33 PM 9/3/96 EDT, you wrote:
>>Wasn't it supposed to be eternally dangerous to make this insense for
>anything other than Temple use.<
>I am  inCenSed by this nonSense about "inSenSe."  What IS it?    (Maybe a
>type of inCenSe that was so potent as to render its users inSenSible -- except
>for those who were inSenSitive to it through immunity achieved by overuse?)
>Punster Pundit in Providence
Punctilious in Providence has struck again, hopefully creating a
list-wide inSentive for scholarly accuracy, without which dialogue
on this list is futile.

Steve Winnett