[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
On Fri, 2 Aug 1996, Thomas M.Simms wrote:
> communication. Shishak is real. Hard data shows who he was. What hard
> contemporary data shows that Solomon existed?
What makes contemporary data so "hard?" Don't contemporaries lie? Why are
you so sure that Shishak is not an invented character? I trully do not
see whence comes the notion that whilst in present people tell the truth,
regarding the past, they surely lie. What supports this trully strange