On Fri, 28 Jun 1996, Ita Sheres wrote: > I don't want to get into this discussion but I find it amusing that you keep > talking about "haruaakh haqedesha" which, indeed is linguistically a female, > but that means a "holy cult priestess" or maybe even a "holy prostitute." Is > it maybe "ha kedosha"? Yup, I think you're right. I'm embarrassed. Alex.